Pressure mounts for Top 100 Project Delivery firms as AI-related infrastructure projects propel demand for design-build and construction management-at-risk delivery methods—increasing revenue gains for this year’s listed firms. Yet behind the numbers, and inside delivery teams, firms say there is a disconnect between project scale and speed, and owners must right-size operations to ensure success.
More detailed information on the Top 100 CM-At-Risk and Design-Build Firms:
View complete list with revenue and market data.
Related Article:
Top 100: Project Delivery Firms Face Stress Test
Click below for earlier editions:
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
Would you like to have this ENR Top List in Excel with revenue and sector data? Click here.
| RANK 2026 | RANK 2025 | FIRM | TOTAL REV. ($ MIL.) |
INT’L REVENUE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Turner Construction Co., New York, N.Y. | 22,567.40 | 712.1 | |
| 2 | 5 | HITT Contracting, Falls Church, Va. | 13,036.30 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | STO Building Group, New York, N.Y. | 13,026.00 | 151 | |
| 4 | 4 | DPR Construction, Santa Clara, Calif. | 12,632.30 | 85.6 | |
| 5 | 2 | The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., Baltimore, Md. | 10,360.00 | 0 | |
| BASED ON 2025 REVENUE IN $ MILLIONS FROM “AT RISK” CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OR PROJECT AND PROGRAM CONTRACTS IN WHICH A FIRM IS EXPOSED TO FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND RISK SIMILAR TO THOSE OF A GENERAL CONTRACTOR **NOT RANKED IN 2024 AMONG THE TOP 100 CM FIRMS-AT-RISK. | |||||
Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing