This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
ENR logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Subscribe
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ENR logo
  • PROJECTS
    • Buildings
    • Construction Methods
    • Design
    • Sustainability
    • Transportation
    • Environment
    • Power & Industrial
    • Water & Dams
    • Best Projects
    • Pulse
  • NEWS
    • ENR News
    • Coronavirus Coverage
    • Regional Coronavirus Coverage
  • BUSINESS
    • Safety & Health
    • Workforce
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Finance
    • Companies
    • Project Delivery
    • Ethics & Corruption
    • Government
    • Risk
    • Contractor Business Strategy
  • TALENT
    • Awards
      • Top 25 Newsmakers
      • Award of Excellence
      • Legacy Award
      • Top Young Professionals
    • Promotions & New Hires
    • Obituaries
    • Annual Photo Contest
  • REGIONS
    • ENR California
    • ENR MidAtlantic
    • ENR Midwest
    • ENR Mountain States
    • ENR New York
    • ENR New England
    • ENR Northwest
    • ENR Southeast
    • ENR Southwest
    • ENR Texas & Louisiana
    • Regional Contests and Surveys
  • TECH
    • Information Technology
    • Construction Technology
    • BIM
  • PRODUCTS
    • Equipment
    • Materials
    • Product Snapshot
  • IDEAS
    • Blogs
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoints
    • Letters
    • Book Reviews
  • COSTS
    • Weekly Construction Economics Reports
    • Quarterly Cost Reports
    • Construction Cost Data Dashboard
    • Construction Cost Index
    • Building Cost Index
    • Historical Indexes
    • FAQs
  • LISTS
    • ENR Top Lists
    • ENR Sourcebooks
    • Survey Schedule
    • 2023 Top 100/400/500 Survey
  • INFOCENTERS
    • Achieve Operational Excellence
    • Disrupting the Status Quo
    • Future Connected Construction
    • Transportation Asset Lifecycle Insights
    • Workforce Strategies for Success
  • EVENTS
    • Award of Excellence
    • Best of the Best Project Awards
    • FutureTech
    • Groundbreaking Women in Construction
    • Global Best Projects Awards
    • LA Infrastructure Forum
    • NY/NJ Infrastructure Forum
    • Regional Best Projects
    • Top 25 Newsmakers
    • Top Young Professionals Conference
    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
  • MORE
    • About
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Social Media Channels
    • Best Project Award Contests
      • Global
      • Regional
    • CE Center
    • Digital Editions
    • ENR Book Store
    • Industry Jobs
    • Podcasts
    • Proposals & Bids
    • Special Advertising Sections
    • Subscribe
    • Videos
    • Year In Construction Photo Contest
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Interactive Spotlights
Home » ENR 2018 Top 225 International Design Firms 1-100
Email
Tweet

ENR 2018 Top 225 International Design Firms 1-100


July 2018

The global market for design firms has been weak for the past four years. Now, as the market has begun to struggle back, a new level of uncertainty has hit the industry from nationalist and populist movements in many major markets and the looming threat of a trade war. The uncertainty in the market can be seen in the results of ENR’s Top 225 International Design Firms survey. The Top 225 firms generated $64.59 billion in design revenue in 2017 from projects outside their home countries, up just 0.7% from $64.11 billion in 2016. This comes after fi ve straight years of declining revenue for the Top 225. Further, the Top 225 had $79.47 billion in revenue from domestic projects in 2017, up a paltry 0.2% from $79.30 billion in 2016.

The table below shows only rankings, firm name and firm type. For the complete data list see the following links.


ENR 2018 Top 225
Current Top 225 International Design Firms Story:

ENR 2018 Top 225: Political Headwinds Worry International Design Firms

More detailed information on ENR's Top 225 International Design Firms:
View complete list with revenue and market data

Click below for earlier editions:
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003

Companies are ranked according to revenue for design services performed in 2017 in $ millions (*). Those with subsidiaries are indicated by (†). For information on subsidiaries and where each firm worked outside of the U.S., see www.enr. com. **Firms not ranked last year. Some markets may not add up to 100% due to omission of “other” miscellaneous market category and rounding. NA-Not available.

Key to type of firm A-architect; E-engineer; EC-engineer-contractor; AE-architect-engineer; EA-engineer-architect; ENV-environmental; GE-geotechnical engineer; L-landscape architect; P-planner; O-other. Other combinations possible. Firms classified themselves.



ENR 2018 Top 225 International Design Firms


001-100 | 101-200 | 201-225
RANK 2018 RANK 2017 FIRM FIRM TYPE
1 4 JACOBS, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.† EAC
2 2 AECOM, Los Angeles, Calif., U.S.A.† EAC
3 20 SNC-LAVALIN, Montreal, Quebec, Canada† EC
4 1 WSP, Montreal, Quebec, Canada E
5 3 ARCADIS NV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands† E
6 8 FLUOR CORP., Irving, Texas, U.S.A.† EC
7 6 DAR GROUP, Dubai, U.A.E.† EA
8 7 STANTEC INC., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada† EAL
9 5 WORLEYPARSONS LTD., North Sydney, NSW, Australia EC
10 9 FUGRO NV, Leidschendam, The Netherlands GE
11 11 TECNICAS REUNIDAS, Madrid, Spain† EC
12 18 KBR INC., Houston, Texas, U.S.A.† EC
13 13 MOTT MACDONALD, Croydon, Surrey, U.K.† E
14 14 ARUP, London, U.K.† E
15 15 SWECO, Stockholm, Sweden EA
16 16 RAMBOLL GROUP A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark EA
17 17 POWER CONSTRUCTION CORP. OF CHINA, Beijing, China† EC
18 29 CHINA ENERGY CORP. LTD., Beijing, China† EC
19 25 GHD, Sydney, NSW, Australia† EA/ENV
20 21 TETRA TECH INC., Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.† E
21 27 EGIS, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, France† E
22 28 GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP., Palm Beach, Fla., U.S.A.† E
23 23 TECHNIPFMC, London, U.K.† EC
24 33 COWI A/S, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark† E
25 35 SURBANA JURONG PRIVATE LTD., Singapore† E
26 22 PETROFAC LTD., Jersey, Channel Islands, U.K.† EC
27 34 CARDNO LTD., Brisbane, Queensland, Australia† E
28 31 INTERTEK-PSI, Arlington Heights, Ill., U.S.A.† E
29 24 HYUNDAI ENGINEERING CO. LTD., Seoul, S. Korea EC
30 26 BECHTEL, San Francisco, Calif., U.S.A.† EC
31 30 CB&I, The Woodlands, Texas, U.S.A.† EC
32 38 MAIRE TECNIMONT SPA, Milan, Italy† EC
33 36 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD., Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India† EC
34 101 WOOD PLC, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.† EC
35 37 POYRY, Vantaa, Finland† E
36 42 SYSTRA, Paris, France† E
37 44 CHINA COMMUNICATIONS CONSTRUCTION GROUP LTD., Beijing, China† EC
38 41 TRACTEBEL ENGINEERING SA, Brussels, Belgium† E
39 43 BLACK & VEATCH, Overland Park, Kan., U.S.A.† EC
40 48 AF GROUP, Stockholm, Sweden† E
41 45 HATCH LTD., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada† EC
42 47 AURECON, Melbourne, VIC, Australia E
43 46 ROYAL HASKONINGDHV, Amersfoort, The Netherlands† E
44 53 NIPPON KOEI GROUP, Tokyo, Japan† EA
45 93 JSTI GROUP, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China† E
46 40 KHATIB & ALAMI, Beirut, Lebanon† EA
47 39 PARSONS, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.† EC
48 32 SENER INGENIERIA Y SISTEMAS SA, Las Arenas (Getxo), Vizcaya, Spain† EC
49 50 EXP, Chicago, Ill., U.S.A. E
50 54 CHINA PETROLEUM ENGINEERING CO., Beijing, China EC
51 58 IDOM, Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain EA
52 51 MEINHARDT GROUP INTERNATIONAL, Melbourne, VIC, Australia† E
53 52 IBI GROUP, Toronto, Ontario, Canada† EA
54 132 TPF SA, Brussels, Belgium† E
55 55 TECNICA Y PROYECTOS SA (TYPSA), Madrid, Spain† EA
56 ** THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS, Essen, NRW, Germany† EC
57 57 GENSLER, New York, N.Y., U.S.A. A
58 61 AEDAS, Hong Kong, China A
59 65 SINOPEC ENGINEERING (GROUP) CO. LTD., Beijing, China† EC
60 62 ILF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Rum/Innsbruck, Austria† E
61 63 HDR, Omaha, Neb., U.S.A.† EA
62 60 DORSCH HOLDING GMBH, Offenbach am Main, Germany† E
63 69 CHINA CHENGDA ENGINEERING CO. LTD., Chengdu, Sichuan Prov., China EC
64 64 CHINA NATIONAL MACHINERY INDUSTRY CORP., Beijing, China† EC
65 85 AUSENCO LTD., South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia† E
66 59 FICHTNER GROUP, Stuttgart, Germany† E
67 70 SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP, New York, N.Y., U.S.A.† AE
68 67 ARTELIA, Lyon, France† E
69 78 AYESA, Sevilla, Spain E
70 91 KEPCO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., Gyeongsangbuk-do, S. Korea AE
71 ** SAMSUNG ENGINEERING CO. LTD., Seoul, S. Korea† EC
72 89 ASSYSTEM, Paris, France† EC
73 76 ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL (ACKG), Tokyo, Japan† E
74 66 ASSOCIATED CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Athens, Amaroussion, Greece† AE
75 71 CTCI CORP., Taipei, Taiwan† EC
76 83 KOHN PEDERSEN FOX ASSOCIATES PC, New York, N.Y., U.S.A.† A
77 73 CHINA RAILWAY GROUP LTD., Beijing, China† EC
78 72 CDM SMITH, Boston, Mass., U.S.A.† EA
79 79 AEGION CORP., Chesterfield, Mo., U.S.A. EC
80 105 DOHWA ENGINEERING CO. LTD., Seoul, S. Korea E
81 99 ITALCONSULT SPA, Rome, Italy† E
82 120 ACCIONA INFRAESTRUCTURAS, Madrid, Spain† EC
83 84 BECA GROUP LTD., Auckland, New Zealand† EA
84 88 MORRISON HERSHFIELD, Atlanta, Ga., U.S.A.† EA
85 81 PROGER SPA, Rome, Italy† EA
86 94 PM GROUP, Dublin, Ireland† EA
87 98 DPS GROUP, Cork, Ireland† E
88 96 CHINA TIANCHEN ENGINEERING CORP., Tianjin, China EA
89 86 EHAF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Cairo, Egypt AE
90 75 KEO INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS WLL, Kuwait City, Kuwait AEP
91 95 SSH, Manama, Bahrain† AE
92 90 BILFINGER TEBODIN BV, The Hague, The Netherlands† E
93 97 NKY ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, Ankara, Turkey AE
94 102 ECG ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS GROUP SA, Cairo, Egypt EA
95 ** DRA GROUP HOLDINGS, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa† EC
96 92 HOK, St. Louis, Mo., U.S.A. AE
97 103 ATLAS GROUP, Katy, Texas, U.S.A.† EA
98 49 LOUIS BERGER, Morristown, N.J., U.S.A.† EA
99 68 CHIYODA CORP., Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan† EC
100 87 NORR, Chicago, Ill., U.S.A.† AE
Subscription Center
  • About ENR UNLIMITED
  • Join ENR UNLIMITED
  • Renew Membership
  • Create Account
  • Change Address
  • Pay My Bill
  • Free eNewsletters
  • Customer Care

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ENR audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep.

close
  • Egnyte two people
    Sponsored byEgnyte

    Building Resilience Today for Tomorrow’s Growth

Popular Stories

Workforce.jpg

Boosted by All Sectors, Construction Adds 25K Jobs in May

Gulf Shores Bridge.jpeg

Citing 'Personal Vendetta,' Alabama Judge Halts Work on $52M Bridge Project

Atlanta_crane_accident.jpg.png

Crane's Falling Counterweights Injure Four, Damage Atlanta Apartment Project

SCV-Water-PFAS-Treatment-7_ENRready.jpg

DuPont, Spinoffs To Pay $1.19B in Largest Yet PFAS in Drinking Water Settlement

Iowa_Apartment_collapse_ENRwebready.jpg

Engineering Reports Highlight Iowa Building's Problems Before Collapse

Industry Jobs



Webinar

Free Webinar

 

Events

June 13, 2023

Unifying Your Information: Using Email to Eliminate Project Delays and Rework

Unmanaged information such as important email correspondence can quickly become a chaotic, obtrusive, and risky burden on your organization. This webinar discusses what a Single Source of Truth is, and why it is critical to your business’ success. Join us to learn how you can benefit from unifying your project information.

Sponsored by:

Mail Manager

View All Submit An Event

Poll

How Do You Expect the Infrastructure Act’s Funding to Impact Your Firm?

What impact does your firm expect from future IIJA funding?
When do you expect states/localities in your area to start advertising Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act-funded projects?
How do you expect the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to impact your firm’s backlog in the next 2-3 years?
How would you describe staffing levels at your firm currently?
Since Jan. 1, what is the overall trend in your region for construction materials prices (year over year)?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

ENR Square Foot Costbook, 2023 Edition

ENR Square Foot Costbook, 2023 Edition

See More Products

Special Ad Section

ENR General Building Contracting and Engineering Today
 ENR GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTING AND ENGINEERING TODAY
 View all Special Ad Sections
 Archives

 


The latest news and information

#1 Source for Construction News, Data, Rankings, Analysis, and Commentary

JOIN ENR UNLIMITED
  • Resources
    • Photo Submissions
    • Customer Service
    • Digital Edition
    • Survey And Sample
    • FAQ
  • ABOUT US
    • Advertise
    • FAQs
    • Contact Us
  • Subscription Center
    • Subscribe
    • Renew
    • Create Account
    • Change Address
    • Pay My Bill
    • Free eNewsletters
    • About ENR UNLIMITED
    • Customer Care
  • Privacy
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2023. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing