ENR 2018 Top 225 International Design Firms 201-225
July 2018
The global market for design firms has been weak for the past four years. Now, as the market has begun to struggle back, a new level of uncertainty has hit the industry from nationalist and populist movements in many major markets and the looming threat of a trade war. The uncertainty in the market can be seen in the results of ENR’s Top 225 International Design Firms survey. The Top 225 firms generated $64.59 billion in design revenue in 2017 from projects outside their home countries, up just 0.7% from $64.11 billion in 2016. This comes after fi ve straight years of declining revenue for the Top 225. Further, the Top 225 had $79.47 billion in revenue from domestic projects in 2017, up a paltry 0.2% from $79.30 billion in 2016.
Current Top 225 International Design Firms Story:
ENR 2018 Top 225: Political Headwinds Worry International Design Firms
More detailed information on ENR's Top 225 International Design Firms:
View complete list with revenue and market data
Click below for earlier editions:
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003
Companies are ranked according to revenue for design services performed in 2017 in $ millions (*). Those with subsidiaries are indicated by (†). For information on subsidiaries and where each firm worked outside of the U.S., see www.enr. com. **Firms not ranked last year. Some markets may not add up to 100% due to omission of “other” miscellaneous market category and rounding. NA-Not available.
Key to type of firm A-architect; E-engineer; EC-engineer-contractor; AE-architect-engineer; EA-engineer-architect; ENV-environmental; GE-geotechnical engineer; L-landscape architect; P-planner; O-other. Other combinations possible. Firms classified themselves.
ENR 2018 Top 225 International Design Firms
| RANK 2018 | RANK 2017 | FIRM | FIRM TYPE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201 | ** | SEMBOL ULUSLARARASI YATIRIM TARIM PEYSAJ INSAAT, Istanbul, Turkey | AE |
| 202 | 150 | CHINA METALLURGICAL GROUP CORP., Beijing, China† | EC |
| 203 | 182 | NV5 GLOBAL INC., Hollywood, Fla., U.S.A.† | E |
| 204 | 215 | SSOE GROUP, Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.† | EA |
| 205 | 195 | POND, Peachtree Corners, Ga., U.S.A. | EA |
| 206 | 181 | MERRICK & CO., Greenwood Village, Colo., U.S.A. | EA |
| 207 | 209 | YUKSEL PROJE ULUSLARARASI AS, Ankara, Turkey† | EAG |
| 208 | 207 | HEERIM ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS, Seoul, S. Korea | AP |
| 209 | 542 | BEIJING URBAN CONSTRUCTION GROUP CO. LTD., Beijing, China† | EA |
| 210 | 190 | PACIFIC CONSULTANTS CO. LTD., Tokyo, Japan | E |
| 211 | 217 | SASAKI, Watertown, Mass., U.S.A. | AE |
| 212 | 224 | TRC, Lowell, Mass., U.S.A. | E |
| 213 | 212 | DISTANCE STUDIO CONSULTANTS, Giza, Egypt† | E |
| 214 | 208 | ZGF ARCHITECTS LLP, Portland, Ore., U.S.A. | A |
| 215 | 188 | ROBERT A.M. STERN ARCHITECTS, New York, N.Y., U.S.A. | A |
| 216 | ** | VEPICA GRUPO INTERNACIONAL, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain† | EC |
| 217 | ** | NICHOLAS O’DWYER LTD., Dublin, Ireland† | E |
| 218 | 225 | ENGICON, Amman, Jordan | E |
| 219 | 211 | LANGAN, Parsippany, N.J., U.S.A.† | E |
| 220 | 219 | MG2, Seattle, Wash., U.S.A. | A |
| 221 | ** | AECON GROUP INC., Toronto, Ontario, Canada† | EC |
| 222 | 265 | TEKFEN ENGINEERING, Istanbul, Turkey | EA |
| 223 | 222 | CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CORP. LTD., Beijing, China | EC |
| 224 | 226 | BARR ENGINEERING CO., Minneapolis, Minn., U.S.A.† | E |
| 225 | 228 | DLZ CORP., Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.† | EA |