This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • Mid-Atlantic
  • News
    • Newswire
  • Features
    • Projects
    • Companies
  • Top Lists
  • Current Issue
  • Blogs
  • Submit Your Photos
    • People
    • Projects
    • Events
  • Resources
    • Proposals & Bids
    • Industry Jobs
    • Subscribe
    • eNewsletter
    • Events
    • Advertise
    • Reprints and Plaques
    • Staff Directory
    • Construction Cities
  • ENR Home
  • Other Regions
    • ENR Home
    • California
    • MidAtlantic
    • Midwest
    • Mountain States
    • New York
    • New England
    • Northwest
    • Southeast
    • Southwest
    • Texas & Louisiana
Home » Blogs » Mid-Atlantic Monitor » Purple Line Prevails in Environmental Suit
Jim_parsons

Jim Parsons is a freelance writer who covers the industry from metro Washington, DC.

Purple Line Prevails in Environmental Suit

Requirement for updated ridership study remains

Purple Line
Maryland's Purple Line cleared another challenge in the courtroom but still faces more legal battles.
May 30, 2017
Jim Parsons
No Comments
KEYWORDS construction / court ruling / environmental review / light rail / Purple Line / Washington DC Metro
Reprints

One week after ordering new ridership projections for Maryland’s Purple Line, a federal judge has dismissed most of the original lawsuit that sought to block construction of the $5.6 billion project on environmental grounds.

U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon ruled on May 30 that the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) had complied with federal protections on endangered species and migratory birds in the area in its environmental review for the proposed 16-mile light line across Washington, D.C.’s northern suburbs.

The ruling allows Maryland or the Federal Transit Administration to appeal the lawsuit’s remaining issue—how the Purple Line ridership will be affected by ridership declines on the separately operated Metrorail system.

On May 22, Leon ruled that Maryland and federal transit officials “failed to take the requisite ‘hard look’” at recent downward trends in Metro’s ridership, which previous studies estimate will account for approximately 27% of Purple Line riders via system transfers at five planned co-located stations.

Purple Line Transit Partners, a development consortium includes Fluor as equity member and leader of the design-build joint venture, was days away from starting construction on the public-private partnership in August 2016 when Leon revoked the Purple Line’s environmental approvals.

The ruling also froze $900 million in federal New Starts funding, which MTA will rely on for the project’s estimated $2 billion construction cost. Those funds remain part of the Federal Transit Administrations proposed FY 2018 budget, although the time necessary to comply with new court-ordered ridership studies has not been determined.

Maryland officials have claimed that delaying construction start-up has added as much as $13 million a month to the Purple Line’s cost, and that existing funds for planning and design work would likely be exhausted as of June 1. It is uncertain whether Maryland will continue funding the project if the ridership reassessment is appealed. According to court filings, cancelling the project could cost the state more than $800 million.

Purple Line Transit Partners has not commented on its status with the Purple Line since the May 22 ruling. In early May, the firm’s CEO reaffirmed the consortium’s near-term commitment to the project.

Recent Comments

Collaborative LEAN Construction Exists Today

top young pros

ENR Award

The tax word is far dirtier in Virginia than Maryland ....

Shucet was an ENR newsmaker in 2005 for helping to revamp VDOT into a more transparent, honest and efficient agency. Let's hope he can work some more magic.

Jim_parsons

Jim Parsons is a freelance writer who covers the industry from metro Washington, DC.

Post a comment to this article

Report Abusive Comment


Top Lists

Top Design FirmsTop Design Firms
Designers Post Increased Revenue, but Outlook Is Cloudy



Top ContractorsTop Contractors
Regional Builders Grow Revenue at a Steady Pace



Top Specialty ContractorsTop Specialty Contractors
Region’s Specialty Firms Continue to See Healthy Growth




Industry Jobs

Videos

ENR Proposals and Bids


ENR twitterfeed
Tweets by ENR_MA

ENR

ENR December 16, 2019 cover

Dec 16, 2019

To attract a broader and more diverse workforce, companies and unions are courting the LGBTQ+ community and strengthening recruiting and retention efforts.

View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • advertise
    • contact us
    • about us
    • photo submissions
    • customer service
    • digital edition
    • Survey And Sample
  • Subscription Center
    • Subscribe
    • Website Registration
    • Privacy Policy
    • eNewsletters
    • FAQ
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Slideshows
    • Photo Contest

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing