Home » ENR 2017 Top 100 Construction Management-for-Fee Firms

ENR 2017 Top 100 Construction Management-for-Fee Firms

June 2017

The construction process is becoming more complex, as project scope, risk mitigation, project delivery methods and teaming approaches have expanded well beyond the old days of design-bid-build. This new reality has owners increasingly turning to third-party professional service firms to explain their options and make sure their plans are executed.

The market for professional services remains strong, as can be seen in the results of the ENR Top 100 Construction Management-for-Fee and Program Management Firms list. Revenue for the CM-PM group was up 3.3%, to $23.41 billion, in 2016, up from $22.66 billion in 2015. Domestic revenue from CM-PM work rose only 0.1%, to $16.63 billion. However, CM-PM revenue from projects and programs abroad rose sharply by 12.3%, to $6.78 billion, in 2016.

More detailed information on the Top 100 CM-At-Risk and Design-Build Firms:
View complete list with revenue and market data

Click below for earlier editions:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004

Companies are ranked based on total 2016 revenue in $ millions for construction-management or project/program-management services performed as a professional service for a fee.

**=Not ranked in 2016 among the Top 100 CMS.

Key to type of firm: A=Architect; C=Contractor; CM=Construction Management Firm; E=Engineer; EC=Engineer-Contractor; ENV=Environmental Firm. Other combinations are possible.

ENR 2017 Top 100 Construction Management-for-Fee Firms


RANK 2017	RANK 2016	FIRM	FIRM TYPE	TOTAL REV. 2016 ($ MIL.)
1	1	BECHTEL, San Francisco, Calif.	EC	5909.0
2	2	AECOM, Los Angeles, Calif.	EAC	3253.7
3	3	CH2M, Englewood, Colo.	E	2204.4
4	6	PARSONS, Pasadena, Calif.	EC	1675.3
5	5	JLL, Chicago, Ill.	CM	1639.3
6	4	JACOBS, Dallas, Texas	EAC	1199.3
7	7	CBRE GROUP INC., Los Angeles, Calif.	CM	1030.0
8	8	HILL INTERNATIONAL INC., Philadelphia, Pa.	CM	690.1
9	**	CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, Chicago, Ill.	CM	653.6
10	11	WSP \| PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF, New York, N.Y.	E	490.3
11	13	ATKINS N.A./FAITHFUL+GOULD, New York, N.Y.	EA	269.8
12	12	LOUIS BERGER, Morristown, N.J.	EAP	247.0
13	17	HDR, Omaha, Neb.	EA	201.7
14	24	LENDLEASE, New York, N.Y.	C	199.0
15	16	THE LIRO GROUP, Syosset, N.Y.	EA	195.2
16	20	BLACK & VEATCH, Overland Park, Kan.	EC	191.5
17	14	THE TURNER CORP., New York, N.Y.	EC	187.9
18	65	AMEC FOSTER WHEELER, Atlanta, Ga.	EC	183.3
19	15	ARCADIS N.A./CALLISON RTKL, Highlands Ranch, Colo.	EA	183.0
20	18	BURNS & MCDONNELL, Kansas City, Mo.	EAC	177.0
21	23	GILBANE BUILDING CO., Providence, R.I.	C	136.6
22	21	CUMMING, Los Angeles, Calif.	CM	117.8
23	19	CDM SMITH, Boston, Mass.	EC	113.4
24	34	HASKELL, Jacksonville, Fla.	EC	103.4
25	38	KLEINFELDER, San Diego, Calif.	EA	85.9
26	22	MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, Pittsburgh, Pa.	EA	80.2
27	25	TURNER & TOWNSEND INC., New York, N.Y.	CM	79.7
28	32	CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC., Walnut Creek, Calif.	E	74.6
29	28	RS&H INC., Jacksonville, Fla.	EA	74.0
30	31	THE VERTEX COS. INC., Weymouth, Mass.	CM	73.5
31	29	HEERY INTERNATIONAL, Atlanta, Ga.	AE	71.7
32	53	MARKON SOLUTIONS, Falls Church, Va.	CM	52.8
33	36	MCDONOUGH BOLYARD PECK INC., Fairfax, Va.	CM	51.9
34	**	CARDNO, Lone Tree, Colo.	ENV	51.8
35	39	MORTENSON CONSTRUCTION, Minneapolis, Minn.	C	45.4
36	27	KITCHELL CORP., Phoenix, Ariz.	EC	45.0
37	50	TECTONIC ENG’G & SURVEYING, Mountainville, N.Y.	E	45.0
38	42	PMA CONSULTANTS LLC, Detroit, Mich.	CM	43.3
39	89	MARK G. ANDERSON CONSULT'S, Washington, D.C.	CM	40.3
40	**	HW LOCHNER, Chicago, Ill.	EC	40.0
41	41	GANNETT FLEMING, Camp Hill, Pa.	EA	38.1
42	44	URBAN ENGINEERS INC., Philadelphia, Pa.	E	37.1
43	26	VANIR CONSTRUCTION MGMT., Sacramento, Calif.	CM	36.5
44	52	LEA+ELLIOTT INC., Grand Prairie, Texas	EA	32.0
45	56	VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATES INC., Emeryville, Calif.	CM	31.1
46	**	TARGET ENGINEERING GROUP, Coral Gables, Fla.	CM	30.5
47	48	PROJECT TIME & COST LLC, Atlanta, Ga.	CM	30.0
48	**	LEE KENNEDY CO. INC., Quincy, Mass.	C	29.7
49	49	HARRIS & ASSOCIATES INC., Concord, Calif.	E	28.8
50	40	THE YATES COS. INC., Philadelphia, Miss.	EC	28.7
51	37	BALFOUR BEATTY US, Dallas, Texas	C	28.6
52	51	BOSWELL ENG'G INC., South Hackensack, N.J.	E	28.4
53	57	HGA, Ruston, La.	E	26.8
54	**	WILLIAMS INDUST. SERVICESS GROUP, Tucker, Ga.	C	26.0
55	61	ALPHA CORP., Dulles, Va.	CM	25.4
56	43	ATCS PLC, Herndon, Va.	E	25.3
57	60	BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INC., Washington, D.C.	CM	25.0
58	64	FREESE AND NICHOLS INC., Fort Worth, Texas	EA	24.7
59	58	ON-BOARD ENGINEERING CORP., East Windsor, N.J.	E	24.0
60	**	METRIC ENGINEERING INC., Miami, Fla.	E	23.2
61	79	CHANEN CONSTRUCTION CO. INC., Phoenix, Ariz.	C	23.1
62	80	DANNENBAUM ENGINEERING CORP., Houston, Texas	E	22.5
63	66	GAFCON INC., San Diego, Calif.	CM	22.2
64	**	BARTLETT COCKE GEN’L CONTRS., San Antonio, Texas	EC	22.0
65	**	HOLLISTER CONSTR. SERVICES LLC, Parsippany, N.J.	C	21.9
66	75	EISMAN & RUSSO INC., Jacksonville, Fla.	CM	21.8
67	69	HOAR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, Birmingham, Ala.	CM	21.2
68	71	OMEGA, Lisle, Ill.	CM	20.9
69	59	CSA GROUP, New York, N.Y.	AE	20.4
70	**	CORDOBA CORP, Los Angeles, Calif.	E	20.0
71	93	FLUOR CORP., Irving, Texas	EC	20.0
72	**	TETRA TECH INC., Pasadena, Calif.	E	20.0
73	92	ELECTRICAL CONSULTANTS INC., Billings, Mont.	E	19.3
74	54	MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK, Washington, D.C.	AE	19.0
75	77	STANTEC INC., Irvine, Calif.	EAL	18.0
76	78	SAVIN ENGINEERS PC, Pleasantville, N.Y.	CM	18.0
77	84	POWER ENGINEERS INC., Hailey, Idaho	EA	16.3
78	88	SWINERTON INC., San Francisco, Calif.	C	15.4
79	**	JAMES R. VANNOY & SONS CONSTR., Jefferson, N.C.	C	15.0
80	**	SKANSKA USA INC., New York, N.Y.	C	14.8
81	45	CRB, St. Louis, Mo.	C	14.2
82	**	C2G INTERNATIONAL LLC, Aliso Viejo, Calif.	CM	14.2
83	**	OAC SERVICES INC., Seattle, Wash.	CM	13.0
84	90	MOCA SYSTEMS INC., Boston, Mass.	CM	12.8
85	**	SACHSE CONSTRUCTION, Detroit, Mich.	C	12.6
86	72	CPH INC., Sanford, Fla.	EA	12.5
87	87	MCCARTHY HOLDINGS INC., St. Louis, Mo.	C	12.0
88	**	CAMPUS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, Pittsford, N.Y.	CM	11.9
89	95	HENDERSON ENGINEERS INC., Lenexa, Kan.	E	11.7
90	**	XL CONSTRUCTION CORP., Milpitas, Calif.	C	11.6
91	62	HR GREEN INC., Cedar Rapids, Iowa	E	11.4
92	**	GARVER, North Little Rock, Ark.	E	11.2
93	**	CDI CORP., Philadelphia, Pa.	EA	11.1
94	82	CPM, San Juan, P.R.	CM	11.0
95	**	HORROCKS ENGINEERS, Pleasant Grove, Utah	E	11.0
96	**	WOOD GROUP, Houston, Texas	EC	10.8
97	85	BERNARDS, San Fernando, Calif.	C	10.6
98	**	GRESHAM, SMITH AND PARTNERS, Nashville, Tenn.	AEP	10.5
99	47	LECHASE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, Rochester, N.Y.	C	10.3
100	98	BMWC CONSTRUCTORS INC., Indianapolis, Ind.	C	10.0
100	**	OMNIBUILD, New York, N.Y.	C	10.0

Infrastructure Remains Central Focus of Buttigieg Confirmation Hearing

Biden Halts Federally-Funded Border Wall Construction

The Top 25 Newsmakers of 2020

Contractor Suit Claims Harassment, Fraud, Retaliation at Port of L.A.

New Sentence for Ex-Bloomberg Building Exec in NYC Bribery Scheme

Industry Jobs

&lt;ilayer src="https://industry-jobs.enr.com/api/regionalcareercenter/?&searchregion=all&jobpostings=3&layout=4 " width="300" height="150"scrolling="no"&gt;&lt;/ilayer&gt;

Events

October 21, 2020

The 2020 Top 600 Specialty Contractors Unveiled

ON DEMAND

This popular annual webinar takes place just as the new rankings are unveiled. It invites leaders from top-ranked firms to talk about their takeaways from the year past and their strategy for the year ahead. ENR will moderate a panel of executives from the largest specialty contracting firms as they discuss the results of the 2020 Top 600 survey and opportunities for future business.

Sponsored by:

October 29, 2020

Solving Problems Before They Happen With A.I.

ON DEMAND

Advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning are giving firms new insights into what can go wrong on their projects. From providing advice on where to allocate resources to identifying real safety risks on jobsites, A.I. advisors are promising to deliver real competitive advantages. Learn how to get past the hype around A.I. and find the benefits of these tools.

Sponsored by: