This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Subscribe
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • Projects
    • Buildings
    • Construction Methods
    • Design
    • Sustainability
    • Transportation
    • Environment
    • Power & Industrial
    • Water & Dams
    • Best Projects
  • Business
    • Safety & Health
    • Workforce
    • Finance
    • Companies
    • Project Delivery
    • Ethics & Corruption
    • Government
    • Risk
    • Pulse
    • Contractor Business Strategy
  • Talent
    • Awards
      • Top 25 Newsmakers
      • Award of Excellence
      • Legacy Award
    • Promotions & New Hires
    • Obituaries
    • Annual Photo Contest
  • Regions
    • ENR California
    • ENR MidAtlantic
    • ENR Midwest
    • ENR Mountain States
    • ENR New York
    • ENR New England
    • ENR Northwest
    • ENR Southeast
    • ENR Southwest
    • ENR Texas & Louisiana
    • Regional Contests and Surveys
  • Tech
    • Information Technology
    • Construction Technology
    • BIM
  • Products
    • Equipment
    • Materials
    • Product Snapshot
  • Ideas
    • Blogs
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoints
    • Letters
    • Book Reviews
  • Costs
    • Construction Economics Archive
    • Historical Indices
    • Quarterly Cost Reports
    • FAQs
  • Lists
    • ENR Top Lists
    • ENR Sourcebooks
    • Survey Schedule
    • 2019 Top 100/400/500 Survey
    • 2018 Top 600 Specialty Contractors Survey
    • 2018 Top International Survey
    • 2018 Top 200 Environmental Firms Survey
  • CE Center
  • InfoCenters
    • The Business of Projects
    • Revolutionizing Productivity Safety
  • Events
    • AEC BuildTech
    • Award of Excellence
    • Best of the Best Project Awards
    • Engineering Management Training
    • FutureTech
    • Groundbreaking Women in Construction
    • Global Best Projects Awards
    • Port Authority of NY & NJ
    • Regional Best Projects
    • Top 25 Newsmakers
    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
  • More
    • Subscription
    • Proposals & Bids
    • Industry Jobs
    • Special Reports
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Store
    • Videos
    • Interactive Spotlights
    • Digital Editions
    • Photo Galleries
    • Special Advertising Sections
  • About
    • Contact
    • Advertise
Home » The 2016 Top 100 Construction Management-for-Fee Firms

The 2016 Top 100 Construction Management-for-Fee Firms

Firms Fill In Owners' Gaps - Some owners are wary about using outside project management, but they are happy to use construction management companies to supplement their staffs. Some owners are wary about using outside project management, but they are happy to use CM firms to supplement their staffs.


ENR 2016 Top 100 Chart

Current Top 100 Design-Builders/CMs/Program Managers Story:
Top 100 Professional Services Firms

More detailed information on the Top 50 Program Management Firms:
View complete list with revenue and market data

Click below for earlier editions:
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |2003


 

Rank 2016/2015 Firm Firm Type Total Rev. 2015 ($ Mil.)
1/1
Bechtel, San Francisco, Calif.
EC
5,845.0
2/3
AECOM, Los Angeles, Calif.
EA
3,350.3
3/2
CH2M, Englewood, Colo.
EC
2,617.6
4/4
Jacobs, Pasadena, Calif.
EAC
1,530.0
5/6
JLL, Chicago, Ill.
CM
1,268.1
6/5
Parsons, Pasadena, Calif.
EC
1,184.9
7/8
CBRE Inc., Los Angeles, Calif.
CM
753.7
8/7
Hill International Inc. Philadelphia, Pa.
CM
720.6
9/20
Cushman & Wakefield, Chicago, Ill.
CM
533.0
10/11
Leidos, Reston, Va.
EAC
387.3
11/10
WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff, New York, N.Y.
EA
300.5
12/12
Louis Berger, Morristown, N.J.
AEP
274.5
13*/13
Black & Veatch, Overland Park, Kan.
EC
241.2
13/14
Atkins N. Amer./Faithful+Gould, New York, N.Y.
EA
225.7
14/17
The Turner Corp., New York, N.Y.
EC
207.1
15/18
Arcadis N. Amer./Callisonrtkl, Highlands Ranch, Colo.
EA
190.0
16/19
The Liro Group, Syosset, N.Y.
EA
182.6
17/16
HDR, Omaha, Neb.
EA
166.3
18/9
Burns & McDonnell, Kansas City, Mo.
EAC
145.4
19/21
CDM Smith, Boston, Mass.
EC
120.7
21/27
Cumming, Los Angeles, Calif.
CM
102.7
22/24
Michael Baker International, Pittsburgh, Pa.
EA
94.0
23/22
Gilbane Building Co., Providence, R.I.
C
83.7
24/23
Lendlease, New York, N.Y.
C
83.4
25/26
Turner & Townsend Inc., New York, N.Y.
CM
82.7
26/28
Vanir Construction Mgmt., Sacramento, Calif.
CM
76.9
27/44
Kitchell Corp., Phoenix, Ariz.
EC
67.0
28/31
RS&H Inc., Jacksonville, Fla.
EA
66.0
29/29
Heery International Inc., Atlanta, Ga.
AE
62.0
30/30
Hatch Mott MacDonald, Iselin, N.J.
E
60.5
31/35
The Vertex Cos. Inc., Weymouth, Mass.
CM
60.2
32/82
Carollo Engineers Inc., Walnut Creek, Calif.
E
56.5
33/25
WorleyParsons, Houston, Texas
EC
56.0
34/**
Haskell, Jacksonville, Fla.
EC
50.6
35/37
DLZ, Columbus, Ohio
EA
50.5
36/36
McDonough Bolyard Peck Inc., Fairfax, Va.
CM
47.9
37/34
Balfour Beatty US, Dallas, Texas
C
46.7
38/51
Kleinfelder, San Diego, Calif.
EA
44.5
39/86
Mortenson Construction, Minneapolis, Minn.
C
41.6
40/47
The Yates Cos. Inc., Philadelphia, Miss.
EC
41.3
41/41
Gannett Fleming, Camp Hill, Pa.
EA
40.8
42/43
PMA Consultants LLC, Detroit, Mich.
CM
38.7
43/**
ATCS PLC, Herndon, Va.
E
38.0
44/39
Urban Engineers Inc., Philadelphia, Pa.
E
36.8
45/69
CRB, St. Louis, Mo.
CM
36.3
46/79
GBA, Lenexa, Kan.
EA
36.0
47/**
LeChase Construction Services, Rochester, N.Y.
C
32.0
48/42
Project Time & Cost LLC, Atlanta, Ga.
CM
31.8
49/40
Harris & Associates Inc., Concord, Calif.
A
31.8
50/59
Tectonic Eng’g & Surveying, Mountainville, N.Y.
E
30.7
51/54
Boswell Engineering Inc., S. Hackensack, N.J.
E
29.8
52/50
Lea+Elliott Inc., Grand Prairie, Texas
EA
29.0
53/78
Markon Solutions, Falls Church, Va.
CM
29.0
54/55
McKissack & McKissack, Washington, D.C.
AE
28.0
55/48
The Pike Cos. Ltd., Rochester, N.Y.
EC
28.0
56/52
Vali Cooper & Associates Inc., Emeryville, Calif.
CM
27.2
57/94
HGA, Ruston, La.
A
27.0
58/53
On-Board Engineering Corp., East Windsor, N.J.
E
26.0
59/57
CSA Group, New York, N.Y.
AE
24.2
60/62
Brailsford & Dunlavey, Washington, D.C.
CM
24.0
61/60
Alpha Corp., Dulles, Va.
CM
23.7
62/92
HR Green Inc., Cedar Rapids, Iowa
EA
22.8
63/**
Versar Inc., Springfield, Va.
ENV
22.8
64/72
Freese and Nichols Inc., Fort Worth, Texas
EA
22.7
65/56
Amec Foster Wheeler, Tucker, Ga.
EC
22.6
66/58
Gafcon Inc., San Diego, Calif.
CM
21.6
67/49
Hunter Roberts Construction, New York, N.Y.
C
21.0
68/**
Triangle Associates, Grand Rapids, Mich.
AE
20.7
69/64
Hoar Program Management, Birmingham, Ala.
CM
20.6
70/**
Novak Construction Co., Chicago, Ill.
C
20.0
71/**
OMEGA, Lisle, Ill.
CM
19.8
72/65
CPH INC., Sanford, Fla.
EA
18.7
73/81
Cotter Consulting Inc., Chicago, Ill.
CM
18.6
74/**
PJ Dick-Trumbull-Lindy Paving, Pittsburgh, Pa.
C
18.0
75/80
Eisman & Russo Inc., Jacksonville, Fla.
CM
17.9
76/**
O'Neal Inc., Greenville, S.C.
EC
17.8
77/83
Stantec Inc., Irvine, Calif.
EAL
17.7
78/68
Savin Engineers Pc, Pleasantville, N.Y.
CM
17.2
79/84
Chanen Construction Co. Inc., Phoenix, Ariz.
C
16.1
80/89
Dannenbaum Engineering Corp., Houston, Texas
E
15.9
81/74
SGI Construction Management, Pasadena, Calif.
CM
15.9
82/76
CPM, San Juan, P.R.
CM
15.7
83/97
Barton Malow Co., Southfield, Mich.
C
15.3
84/100
Power Engineers Inc., Hailey, Idaho
EA
15.0
85/88
Bernards, San Fernando, Calif.
C
14.3
86/**
Walbridge, Detroit, Mich.
C
14.3
87/67
McCarthy Holdings Inc., St. Louis, Mo.
C
14.0
88/87
Swinerton Inc., San Francisco, Calif.
C
13.7
89/**
Mark G. Anderson Consult., Washington, D.C.
CM
13.4
90/**
MOCA Systems Inc., Newton, Mass.
AE
13.4
91/98
GHD Inc., Irvine, Calif.
E
12.7
92/**
Electrical Consultants Inc., Billings, Mont.
E
12.4
93/**
Fluor Corp., Irving, Texas
EC
12.2
94/95
Broaddus & Associates, Austin, Texas
CM
11.8
95/**
Henderson Engineers Inc., Lenexa, Kan.
E
11.4
96/**
AFG Group Inc., Herndon, Va.
CM
11.2
97/**
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., St. Paul, Minn.
EA
10.1
98/**
BMWC Constructors Inc., Indianapolis, Ind.
C
10.0
99/**
Civil & Env. Consultants Inc., Pittsburgh, Pa.
E
10.0
100/**
EAC Consulting Inc., Miami, Fla.
A
9.0
* Due to an oversight by ENR, Black & Veatch should have been ranked No. 13 on the Top 100 CM/PM list published on June 20.
Companies are ranked based on total 2015 revenue in $ millions for construction-management or project/program-management services performed as a professional service for a fee. **=not ranked in 2015 among the Top 100 CMS. Key to type of firm: a=architect; c=contractor; cm=construction management firm; ec=engineer-contractor; env=environmental firm. Other combinations are possible.
Subscription Center!
  • Print Edition Subscriptions
  • Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • eNewsletter Subscriptions
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Connect with ENR

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ENR audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep.

Close
Camerasystem-sitecloud-devicesimage1__5fhrhhgw9z__
Sponsored By
Sensera Systems, Inc

Comprehensive Jobsite Monitoring Simplified

Sensera Systems works with the construction industry to improve efficiency, profits, and safety. Providing solutions for real-time visual jobsite monitoring and automation to address progress execution, risk management, and winning work.

Popular Stories

Debbie Skrynski

ENR's 2018 Construction Photography Contest Winners

I-4

Fourth Fatality on I-4 Revamp Adds to Skanska's P3 Woes

SR99tunnel.jpg

Weekend of Events Precedes Seattle Tunnel Opening

Trump Issues New 'Buy American' Directive for Infrastructure Projects

French-influenced legal approach

How Texas' Uncommon Law Is Different on Design Defects

Industry Jobs



ENR Proposals and Bids

Events

March 21, 2019

ENR's Award of Excellence

On March 21, 2019, hundreds of your colleagues will gather at Pier Sixty at Chelsea Piers in New York City for ENR's 54th Annual Award of Excellence Black-Tie Gala. Just like past events, in 2019 you will have the opportunity to network with more than 1,000 construction leaders and make critical connections, while joining us to celebrate the Top 25 Newsmakers for their achievements in 2018 and be inspired by the Award of Excellence Winner.
April 30, 2019

AEC BuildTech

Join us for the inaugural AEC BuildTech Conference & Expo!

View All Submit An Event

Products

2019 BNi Green Building Square Foot Costbook

2019 BNi Green Building Square Foot Costbook

See More Products

Special Ad Section

ABA Forum On Construction Law
  ABA Forum On Construction Law
 View all Special Ad Sections
 Archives

 


ENR

ENR Jan 9, 2016 Cover

Feb 25, 2019

Big Calif.-Ore. dam removals, which triggered the Jan. 25 federal ruling on state clean-water okays, are proceeding to contract.

View More Subscribe
  • Resources
    • advertise
    • contact us
    • about us
    • photo submissions
    • customer service
    • digital edition
    • Survey And Sample
  • Subscription Center
    • Subscribe
    • Website Registration
    • Privacy Policy
    • eNewsletters
    • FAQ
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Slideshows
    • Reader Photos
    • Photo Contest

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing