On April 1, House Democrats revived and expanded a $760-billion, five-year infrastructure “framework” they rolled out on Jan. 29. After those developments, an industry source recalls, “I also thought, ‘OK, this is it and this is what we’ve been waiting for. … Given the state of the emergency, this is exactly the point in time where something like this could move.’ ”

But as COVID-19’s severe impact continues, the congressional focus by ENR press time had shifted to an emergency “CARES 2” bill. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said April 3 on CNBC, “While I’m very much in favor of doing some things [in CARES 2] to meet the needs—clean water, more broadband and the rest of that—that may have to wait for a bill beyond this.” The industry source says, “There’s no question in my mind that infrastructure is put off.”

Industry groups are seeking to keep infrastructure in the Capitol Hill conversation. Jeff Urbanchuk, an American Council of Engineering Companies spokesman, said via email, “We may still be in the emergency response phase … where the focus is still on helping people and businesses, but Congress and the administration need to begin work now on a longer-term recovery agenda built around a robust infrastructure program.” He says House and Senate progress on highway-transit and water resources bills could “frame a recovery package quickly.”

Dave Bauer, American Road & Transportation Builders Association chief executive officer, wants Congress to use the five-year, $287-billion highway bill the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee cleared in July as a beginning point for discussions. “Economic recovery from coronavirus begins with strategic road and bridge improvements,” he said on April 13. Meanwhile, with motor vehicle travel and fuel-tax receipts down, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials projects a drop of at least 30% in states’ transportation revenue over 18 months. It asked Congress for a $50-billion “backstop” so projects and plans can proceed.