Construction Disputes
Can Skanska-Hunt Regain Convention Center Prime Contract?
Judge issues decision over a construction contract dispute on a big Seattle project

A portion of a web page for the Washington State Convention Center in Seattle displaying the location of the new planned addition.
The Washington State Convention Center and a Skanska-Hunt joint venture are heading to trial later this year after a state court judge in Seattle issued a split ruling on the contractor’s request for a preliminary injunction seeking to retain its role on a $1.45-billion convention center addition. The Washington State Convention Center Facilities District had terminated Skanska-Hunt in March and the joint venture filed a lawsuit to stop the convention center from hiring a replacement contractor
Skanska-Hunt stated that it had executed numerous subcontract agreements for the work but construction work had not started.
Judge Beth M. Andrus’ ruling denied Skanska-Hunt’s attempt to force the convention center to reinstate the pre-construction agreement but stopped the convention center from hiring a new contractor under the GC/CM alternative project delivery method.
According to the ruling, Andrus says the convention center was within its right to terminate the pre-construction agreement for “convenience” based on the owner’s testimony, but that since many facts are in dispute by Skanska-Hunt, a trial is necessary.
Andrus, however, ruled the convention center could not enter into contract with another firm based upon the GC/CM relationship as outlined by the state legislature. “By electing, under [Regional Code of Washington] 39.10.360(6) to enter into a contract with Skanska-Hunt, Skanska-Hunt’s right to be the firm with whom [the convention center] negotiated" became a vested right, Andrus ruled. Andrus ordered Skanska-Hunt to furnish a $1 million injunction bond and scheduled the trial to start Aug. 1.
The joint venture consists of Hunt Construction Group and Skanska USA Building. In its complaint, Skanska-Hunt claims that its proposed fee, 2.95% of the construction budget, was 30% lower than that of its next closest competitor, a joint venture of Clark Construction Group and Lease Crutcher Lewis. A third joint venture also made the short list, Mortenson Construction and PCL Construction Services.
Looking for quick answers on construction and engineering topics?
Try Ask ENR, our new smart AI search tool.
Ask ENR →



