ENR 2023 Top 150 Global Design Firms
Distinct geopolitical challenges frequently are the major force behind revenue changes for the Top 225 International Design Firms. Yet as climate change, energy transition and decarbonization goals drive forward a global shift to sustainability, firms are distinctly reconfiguring operations to generate more sustainable solutions.
Current Top 150 Global Design Firms Story:
ENR Top 225 International Design Firms: Resilient Design Demands Grow
More detailed information on ENR's Top 150 Global Design Firms:
View complete list with revenue and market data
Click below for earlier editions:
2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003
Companies are ranked according to revenue for design services performed in 2022 in $ millions (*). Those with subsidiaries are indicated by (†). For information on subsidiaries and where each firm worked outside of the U.S., see www.enr. com. **Firms not ranked last year. Some markets may not add up to 100% due to omission of “other” miscellaneous market category and rounding. NA-Not available.
Key to type of firm A-architect; E-engineer; EC-engineer-contractor; AE-architect-engineer; EA-engineer-architect; ENV-environmental; GE-geotechnical engineer; L-landscape architect; P-planner; O-other. Other combinations possible. Firms classified themselves.
Would you like to have this ENR Top List in Excel with revenue and sector data? Click here.
ENR 2023 Top 150 Global Design Firms
| RANK 2023 |
RANK 2022 |
FIRM | FIRM TYPE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Power Construction Corp. of China, Beijing, China† | EC |
| 2 | 2 | China Energy Engineering Corp. Ltd., Beijing, China† | EC |
| 3 | 3 | Jacobs Solutions Inc., Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.† | M |
| 4 | 6 | WSP Global Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada† | E |
| 5 | 4 | AECOM, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A. | M |
| 6 | 5 | China Communications Construction Group Ltd., Beijing, China† | EA |
| 7 | 7 | Worley Ltd., North Sydney, NSW, Australia | E |
| 8 | 10 | Fluor, Irving, Texas, U.S.A.† | EC |
| 9 | 8 | Arcadis NV, Amsterdam, Netherlands† | M |
| 10 | 12 | Tetra Tech, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A. | M |
| 11 | 11 | Stantec Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada† | M |
| 12 | 9 | SNC-Lavalin, Montreal, Quebec, Canada† | M |
| 13 | 13 | Wood, Aberdeen, Scotland, U.K. | EC |
| 14 | 14 | China Railway Construction Corp. Ltd., Beijing, China† | A |
| 15 | 17 | HDR, Omaha, Neb., U.S.A.† | M |
| 16 | 15 | China Railway Group Ltd., Beijing, China† | EC |
| 17 | 21 | Arup Group Ltd., London, England, U.K.† | M |
| 18 | 19 | China National Chemical Eng’g Group Corp. Ltd., Beijing, China† | EC |
| 19 | 23 | Burns & McDonnell, Kansas City, Mo., U.S.A.† | O |
| 20 | 20 | Mott MacDonald, Croydon, England, U.K.† | E |