ENR 2020 Top 200 Environmental Firms
With public and private sector work at full tilt in 2019, Top 200 Environmental Firms revenue total rose 2.8% to $58.9 billion from the previous year’s also strong increase. Domestic revenue was up 3.4% to $45.2 billion and non-U.S. markets stayed steady to generate $13.7 billion in revenue. But just a few months later as the COVID-10 pandemic jolted the marketplace, firms are battling to leverage last year’s foundation and make adjustments to the “new abnormal” to gain strength in 2020 and beyond
Please email ENRT200env@enr.com to be added to the Top 200 Environmental Firms email list for the 2021 survey filing, or to ask questions. The approximate Top 200 eligibility floor is $18 million in environmental services revenue for the prior year.
More detailed information on ENR's Top 200 Environmental Firms:
View complete 2020 list, with full market analysis
Current Top 200 Environmental Firms Story:
The Top 200 Environmental Firms: Pushing Past the Pandemic
Click below for earlier editions:
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
Asterisks (**) indicate firm was not ranked on the 2019 Top 200 list.
Type of Firm: Designation based on the largest % of 2019 environmental services revenue in categories described below. Multiple listings appear if the largest % of revenue is evenly split between two or more categories or is within 5%.
DES Engineering and/or design; CSL Consulting and/or studies; CON Construction, contracting and/or remediation; CM-PM Construction management and/or program management; EQP Equipment or device manufacture; OPS Contract operations; R&D Technology and/or research and development, OTH Services not already designated.
Would you like to have this ENR Top List in Excel with revenue and sector data? Click here.
ENR 2020 Top 200 Environmental Firms
| RANK 2020 | RANK 2019 | FIRM | TYPE OF WORK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | AECOM, New York, N.Y. | DES |
| 2 | 2 | JACOBS, Dallas, Texas | CSL |
| 3 | 4 | TETRA TECH INC., Pasadena, Calif. | CSL |
| 4 | 6 | BECHTEL, Reston, Va. | CON |
| 5 | ** | MORTENSON, Minneapolis, Minn. | CON |
| 6 | 16 | WSP, Montreal, Quebec, Canada | CSL |
| 7 | 7 | WEBUILD S.P.A., Milan, Italy | CM/PM |
| 8 | 8 | STANTEC, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada | DES |
| 9 | 11 | HDR, Omaha, Neb. | DES-CSL |
| 10 | 15 | GARNEY HOLDING CO., Kansas City, Mo. | CON |
| 11 | 9 | SUEZ NORTH AMERICA, Paramus, N.J. | OPS |
| 12 | 14 | BLACK & VEATCH, Overland Park, Kansas | DES |
| 13 | 12 | ARCADIS NV, Amsterdam, Netherlands | CSL |
| 14 | 13 | ERM, London, England, U.K. | CSL |
| 15 | 36 | U.S. ECOLOGY, Boise, Idaho | OPS |
| 16 | 10 | WOOD, Houston, Texas | CON |
| 17 | 19 | GOLDER, Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. | DES-CSL |
| 18 | 20 | KIEWIT CORP., Omaha, Neb. | CON |
| 19 | 18 | CDM SMITH, Boston, Mass. | DES |
| 20 | 17 | GHD, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | CSL-DES |