ENR 2020 Top 200 Environmental Firms
With public and private sector work at full tilt in 2019, Top 200 Environmental Firms revenue total rose 2.8% to $58.9 billion from the previous year’s also strong increase. Domestic revenue was up 3.4% to $45.2 billion and non-U.S. markets stayed steady to generate $13.7 billion in revenue. But just a few months later as the COVID-10 pandemic jolted the marketplace, firms are battling to leverage last year’s foundation and make adjustments to the “new abnormal” to gain strength in 2020 and beyond
Please email ENRT200env@enr.com to be added to the Top 200 Environmental Firms email list for the 2021 survey filing, or to ask questions. The approximate Top 200 eligibility floor is $18 million in environmental services revenue for the prior year.
More detailed information on ENR's Top 200 Environmental Firms:
View complete 2020 list, with full market analysis
Current Top 200 Environmental Firms Story:
The Top 200 Environmental Firms: Pushing Past the Pandemic
Click below for earlier editions:
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
Asterisks (**) indicate firm was not ranked on the 2019 Top 200 list.
Type of Firm: Designation based on the largest % of 2019 environmental services revenue in categories described below. Multiple listings appear if the largest % of revenue is evenly split between two or more categories or is within 5%.
DES Engineering and/or design; CSL Consulting and/or studies; CON Construction, contracting and/or remediation; CM-PM Construction management and/or program management; EQP Equipment or device manufacture; OPS Contract operations; R&D Technology and/or research and development, OTH Services not already designated.
ENR 2020 Top 200 Environmental Firms
| RANK 2020 | RANK 2019 | FIRM | TYPE OF WORK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | AECOM, New York, N.Y. | DES |
| 2 | 2 | JACOBS, Dallas, Texas | CSL |
| 3 | 4 | TETRA TECH INC., Pasadena, Calif. | CSL |
| 4 | 6 | BECHTEL, Reston, Va. | CON |
| 5 | ** | MORTENSON, Minneapolis, Minn. | CON |
| 6 | 16 | WSP, Montreal, Quebec, Canada | CSL |
| 7 | 7 | WEBUILD S.P.A., Milan, Italy | CM/PM |
| 8 | 8 | STANTEC, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada | DES |
| 9 | 11 | HDR, Omaha, Neb. | DES-CSL |
| 10 | 15 | GARNEY HOLDING CO., Kansas City, Mo. | CON |
| 11 | 9 | SUEZ NORTH AMERICA, Paramus, N.J. | OPS |
| 12 | 14 | BLACK & VEATCH, Overland Park, Kansas | DES |
| 13 | 12 | ARCADIS NV, Amsterdam, Netherlands | CSL |
| 14 | 13 | ERM, London, England, U.K. | CSL |
| 15 | 36 | U.S. ECOLOGY, Boise, Idaho | OPS |
| 16 | 10 | WOOD, Houston, Texas | CON |
| 17 | 19 | GOLDER, Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. | DES-CSL |
| 18 | 20 | KIEWIT CORP., Omaha, Neb. | CON |
| 19 | 18 | CDM SMITH, Boston, Mass. | DES |
| 20 | 17 | GHD, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia | CSL-DES |