This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
ENR logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ENR logo
  • News
  • Projects
    • Buildings
    • Construction Methods
    • Design
    • Sustainability
    • Transportation
    • Environment
    • Power & Industrial
    • Water & Dams
    • Best Projects
  • Business
    • Safety & Health
    • Workforce
    • Finance
    • Companies
    • Project Delivery
    • Ethics & Corruption
    • Government
    • Risk
    • Pulse
    • Contractor Business Strategy
  • Talent
    • Awards
      • Top 25 Newsmakers
      • Award of Excellence
      • Legacy Award
      • Top Young Professionals
    • Promotions & New Hires
    • Obituaries
    • Annual Photo Contest
  • Regions
    • ENR California
    • ENR MidAtlantic
    • ENR Midwest
    • ENR Mountain States
    • ENR New York
    • ENR New England
    • ENR Northwest
    • ENR Southeast
    • ENR Southwest
    • ENR Texas & Louisiana
    • Regional Contests and Surveys
  • Tech
    • Information Technology
    • Construction Technology
    • BIM
  • Products
    • Equipment
    • Materials
    • Product Snapshot
  • Ideas
    • Blogs
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoints
    • Letters
    • Book Reviews
  • Costs
    • Construction Economics Archive
    • Construction Cost Index
    • Building Cost Index
    • Historical Indices
    • Quarterly Cost Reports
    • FAQs
  • Lists
    • ENR Top Lists
    • ENR Sourcebooks
    • Survey Schedule
  • CE Center
  • InfoCenters
    • Disrupt or Be Disrupted
    • Innovations in Waterproofing
    • Planning for Project Perfection
    • Revolutionizing Productivity Safety
    • The Business of Projects
  • Events
    • AEC BuildTech
    • Award of Excellence
    • Best of the Best Project Awards
    • FutureTech
    • Groundbreaking Women in Construction
    • Global Best Projects Awards
    • Port Authority of NY & NJ
    • Regional Best Projects
    • Top 25 Newsmakers
    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
  • More
    • Subscription
    • Proposals & Bids
    • Industry Jobs
    • Special Reports
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Store
    • Videos
    • Interactive Spotlights
    • Digital Editions
    • Year In Construction Photo Contest
    • Special Advertising Sections
  • About
    • Contact
    • Advertise
Home » Blogs » Critical Path » House WRDA Bill Hits a Bump En Route to Floor
Tom-ichniowski

Tom Ichniowski has been writing about the federal government as ENR’s Washington Bureau Chief since the George H.W. Bush administration, and he has covered at least five major highway bills. A recognized expert on government policy on infrastructure and regulation, Tom is also a Baltimore native and Orioles fan who grew up rooting for Brooks and Frank Robinson. He is a graduate of Columbia College and Columbia’s graduate school of journalism, where he once used “unrelentless” in a headline.

House WRDA Bill Hits a Bump En Route to Floor

GOP leaders delete harbor trust fund provision, sparking Democrats' ire

September 24, 2016
Tom Ichniowski
No Comments
KEYWORDS Corps of Engineers / Flint water crisis / transportation / Transportation and Infrastructure Committee / water infrastructure / water resources
Reprints

A new Water Resources Development Act—traditionally a bipartisan measure—has run into a partisan snag in the House.

Democrats are upset that, just days before a possible floor vote, Republicans deleted a Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund provision that was part of the WRDA that cleared committee in May. Democrats say that if the problem isn’t fixed, they will oppose the bill.

The WRDA measure authorizes funds for Army Corps of Engineers water projects and is one of the major infrastructure measures this year.

The provision, part of a bill that the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (T&I) approved unanimously, would lift the cap on annual trust fund spending on Corps projects, starting in fiscal 2027.

But on Sept. 22, word spread that GOP leaders had taken the trust fund provision out of the bill. A T&I spokesman says via email that committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-Pa.) “supports more investment in our infrastructure, but in order to ensure compliance with the Rules of the House and the Congressional Budget Act, we were required to remove the provision.”

The T&I committee’s top Democrat, Peter DeFazio (Ore.)—a strong supporter of the trust fund language—wrote to his colleagues on Sept. 23, urging them to vote against the House WRDA bill.

DeFazio said that in the past decade, less than 60% of the trust fund’s revenue has been spent on projects. He added that, in fiscal 2016, trust fund spending fell $400 million short of the $1.6 billion in revenue taken in.

DeFazio said in a Sept. 22 statement, “I'm incredibly disappointed that the Republican leadership has sabotaged a good, bipartisan bill that would have maintained and strengthened our ports, harbors and waterways, and our nation's economic competitiveness.”

DeFazio said that unless the WRDA bill is changed, he would oppose it.
He’s not the only one. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told reporters on Sept. 22 that because Republicans removed the trust fund provision, Democrats are “not going to be voting for that bill.”

The House WRDA problem comes only about a week after the Senate approved its WRDA version by an overwhelming 95-3 vote. That action, on Sept. 15, was a big lift to construction, engineering and water industry officials, who had been working hard to see the bill move through Congress this year.

The Senate bill doesn’t include language removing the trust fund spending limit.

WRDA-watchers are now waiting to see what the House will do. The next key event is a House Rules Committee meeting scheduled for the evening of Sept. 26. That panel will set the ground rules for the WRDA floor debate and decide which amendments will be permitted to be offered.

Sean O’Neill, Associated General Contractors of America senior director for infrastructure advancement, said in a Sept. 23 interview that “it’s too early to say” whether the House flap over the harbor trust fund will doom the bill.

O’Neill adds, “There are a lot of people that are trying to work to get the bill onto the floor and [approved and] off the floor.”

Another industry source says that members of the House appropriations and budget committees probably favored stripping out the trust fund provision from the WRDA. They view the language as an incursion on their turf by the Transportation and Infrastructure panel, which authorizes funding, generally subject to annual appropriations.

The source adds, “This is just one of those [actions] where you’re totally rewriting the power base. And this shifts it from the appropriators to the authorizers.”

The source notes that the harbor trust fund helps finance the Corps operation and maintenance account, the largest line-item in the agency’s annual civil works budget.

AGC and other industry groups, as well as key House and Senate lawmakers, have been working to return WRDAs to an every-other-year timetable, to provide more certainty in planning projects.
“To get them back on a two-year schedule is important,” O’Neill says. “That’s one of the reasons why we’re really pushing them to get this done this year.”

The last WRDA was enacted in 2014 but the previous measure became law back in 2007.

WRDA backers now face severe time pressure. The new battle comes with only days left before Congress takes its pre-election recess.

A further wrinkle is that there is a generally partisan dispute over funding for repairs and upgrades for drinking-water infrastructure for Flint, Mich., and other localities suffering severe problems with those systems.

The Senate-passed WRDA included funds for Flint and the other cities but the House T&I committee version did not. That panel doesn’t have jurisdiction over Safe Drinking Water Act matters.

Flint advocates on Capitol Hill also have been trying to get the drinking water funds attached to a different piece of legislation—a nearly government-wide stopgap funding bill that Congress must pass by Sept. 30 to avert agency shutdowns.

But so far, a recently introduced Republican-drafted stopgap, or continuing resolution, has no water funding for Flint and the other localities.

 

Recent Comments

Truth

Great Article, Keen to Learn More!

Thank you for your article Can you please...

Home Builder Burnout

I would love to add our Director

Tom-ichniowski

Tom Ichniowski has been writing about the federal government as ENR’s Washington Bureau Chief since the George H.W. Bush administration, and he has covered at least five major highway bills. A recognized expert on government policy on infrastructure and regulation, Tom is also a Baltimore native and Orioles fan who grew up rooting for Brooks and Frank Robinson. He is a graduate of Columbia College and Columbia’s graduate school of journalism, where he once used “unrelentless” in a headline.

Post a comment to this article

Report Abusive Comment

Subscription Center
  • Subscribe
  • Renew Your Subscription
  • eNewsletter Subscriptions
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Connect with ENR

More Videos

Popular Stories

NTSB final Report

Final Collapse Report Details Miami Bridge Team's Failures

The Claw

Famous Concert Stage Structure Becomes New Landmark for Utah Aquarium Expansion

1125MortMortensonobit.jpg

Mortenson Construction's M.A. "Mort" Mortenson is Dead at 82

Damaged tower cranes

Tricky Takedown of Tower Cranes Readied Collapsed New Orleans Hotel for Demolition

Southern Ohio Veterans Memorial Highway

Fixing Construction's Fixed-Price Conundrum

Industry Jobs



Products

2020 BNi Green Building Square Foot Costbook

2020 BNi Green Building Square Foot Costbook

See More Products

Special Ad Section

Construction Equipment Showcase
 Construction Equipment Showcase
 View all Special Ad Sections
 Archives

 


ENR

ENR Digital Edition Cover

Dec 9, 2019

A joint venture of Skanska, Corman Kokosing Construction Co. and McLean Contracting Co. is moving toward an early 2020 construction start for a $463-million replacement for a 79-year-old bridge across the Potomac River, south of Washington, D.C.

View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • advertise
    • contact us
    • about us
    • photo submissions
    • customer service
    • digital edition
    • Survey And Sample
  • Subscription Center
    • Subscribe
    • Website Registration
    • Privacy Policy
    • eNewsletters
    • FAQ
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Slideshows
    • Photo Contest

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing