The Dubai Civil Aviation Authority suspended all flight operations at the airport as a precautionary measure after the strike ignited a fire near one of the airport’s fuel tanks, according to a statement posted by the Dubai Media Office on X. Civil defense teams contained the fire with no reported injuries. 

Emirates posted an advisory urging all passengers to stay home. “All flights to and from Dubai have been temporarily suspended,” the airline wrote. “The safety of our passengers and crew is our highest priority and will not be compromised.”  

Some flights were diverted to Al Maktoum International Airport in Jebel Ali. Bloomberg reported that operations were suspended for more than seven hours—the longest single halt since Dubai reopened under designated safe air corridors in the first days of the conflict.

Not the First Strike

This was not an isolated incident. According to CNBC, Monday’s fuel tank strike was the fourth drone-related incident at the Dubai airport since the U.S. and Israel launched joint strikes against Iran on Feb. 28 under Operation Epic Fury.

Iran has since retaliated across several Gulf Cooperation Council states with a sustained campaign of missiles and drones. The Dubai Media Office reported that two falling drones wounded four people near the airport three days before the March 16 strike, according to Reuters and the Associated Press. A separate drone was intercepted over the Fujairah oil hub the day before, igniting a fire there as well.

Flightradar24 reported March 5 on X that cancellations across seven major regional airports—Dubai International, Hamad International in Doha, Zayed International in Abu Dhabi, Sharjah International, Kuwait International, Bahrain International and Al Maktoum International—exceeded 19,000 flights in the first seven days of the conflict.

British Airways, Lufthansa Group, KLM, Cathay Pacific, Finnair and Virgin Atlantic had already suspended Dubai service through late March or beyond before Monday's incident.

Linus Bauer, founder and global managing partner of UAE-based aviation consultancy BAA & Partners, told The National the structural consequences will extend well beyond individual cancellations. 

“If disruptions remain short-lived, the impact is manageable,” Bauer said. “If airspace avoidance persists, airlines face structurally higher operating costs, weaker aircraft utilization and profit margin pressure—especially on long-haul networks reliant on Middle East transit corridors.”

---

RELATED

Dubai Unveils $35B Plan for World's Largest Airport

---

Why One Fuel Tank Can Ground a Mega-Airport

The impact of the March 16 strike shows how large hub airports are designed to function. At DXB, aviation fuel is distributed through underground hydrant systems running beneath the apron and gates, allowing dozens of aircraft to be fueled simultaneously without tanker trucks.

This infrastructure enables the throughput that made Dubai International the world’s busiest international airport in 2025, when Dubai Airports reported 95.2 million passengers—the highest annual international traffic ever recorded by any airport—along with 454,800 aircraft movements.

Paul Griffiths, CEO of Dubai Airports, said in the operator’s Feb. 11 traffic release that “record traffic is no longer an exception, but part of its operating reality.”

When hydrant capacity is reduced even partially, the bottleneck is immediate. Airlines can shift to tanker trucks, but at the cost of significantly slower fueling rates and reduced gate turnover.

In a system designed for tight aircraft rotation banks, this mismatch propagates into departure delays, missed connections and cascading schedule disruptions across an airline’s global network.

The International Air Transport Association’s guidance on airport fuel storage capacity identifies supply interruptions as a critical risk capable of triggering canceled flights, diversions, payload limits and emergency refueling stops across carrier operations. 

Aviation security firm Osprey Flight Solutions, which works with airlines on conflict-zone risk planning, has noted in published guidance that airports operating near active conflict zones frequently fall back on emergency response frameworks designed for weather events and mechanical failures—contingency plans not meant for responding to possible sustained attacks.

The Redundancy Question

Dubai has long understood that DXB alone cannot support the emirate’s long-term aviation ambitions. In April 2024, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum approved a $35-billion expansion of Al Maktoum International Airport designed to eventually accommodate 260 million passengers annually, with 400 aircraft gates and five parallel runways. 

Dubai Airports has set a first-phase capacity target of 150 million passengers per year within the next decade, with Emirates expected to begin operating from the facility by 2032.

But secondary capacity can only do so much. Al Maktoum absorbed diverted traffic when DXB suspended operations, as it has in previous incidents. But a diversion airport handling a fraction of DXB’s volume cannot replicate the hub function dozens of international carriers and millions of connecting passengers depend on.

Anita Mendiratta, an aviation and tourism consultant, framed the geographic stakes in an interview with the Associated Press during the early days of the conflict.

“Within the Middle East, an eight-hour flying distance covers two-thirds of the world population,” Mendiratta said. “When that corridor is blocked, it forces aviation to either move far north, which is going into potentially other conflict airspace, such as Russia, such as Pakistan, or fly south. That puts huge pressure on the airlines.”

---

RELATED

Dubai Unveils $35B Plan for World's Largest Airport

---

The Engineering Lesson

The March 16 attack reinforces a principle engineers have long understood: catastrophic damage is not required to halt a complex facility.

A strike on a single supporting system—fuel storage, electrical supply, communications infrastructure—can produce the same operational outcome as broader destruction of a runway or terminal. 

For airport engineers and planners, DBX's recent shutdown is a case study in what distributed redundancy is designed to prevent as well as the limits of advance planning.