The next step will be to reconcile the Senate bill with the version that the House passed in June, a House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee aide told ENR.

The funding total is an ENR calculation for the new or modified Corps projects. When nonfederal funds are added, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee estimates the total cost of the 30 projects at $55 billion. That compares with a $40-billion total cost for the bill version that the committee approved May 4. That bill authorized funds for 21 projects.

The WRDA measures authorize only the federal funds.

“Enacting WRDA 2022 will keep our economy moving, restore critical ecosystems and protect communities big and small from the worsening impacts of climate change." Senate Committee Chairman Tom Carper (D-Del.), prime architect of the new bill, said in a statement.

As with House and Senate versions of the legislation earlier this year, by far the largest single authorization in the Senate-passed bill is $19 billion for a wide-ranging multi-year flood protection project in coastal Texas. The project's total cost is estimated at $30.9 billion.

Major additions to the version that cleared the Environment and Public Works Committee in May include $2.9 billion in federal funds for a modified Soo Locks project in Michigan; $2.5 billion for modifications to a project at the Indian River Lagoon in central and south Florida; and $2.1 billion in federal funds for harbor deepening in New Jersey.

WRDA measures typically grow as they make their way through Congress, as Army Chief Engineer Lt. Gen. Scott Spellmon completes reports that recommend proceeding with project construction.

Leaders from both parties have stated a goal to continue their legislative streak, which started in 2014, of passing a WRDA bill every two years. 

Michele Stanley, National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association vice president of government and regulatory affairs, said in a statement that the new bill provides "planning certainty and funding for projects over the next two years ... to supply the building materials needed to build these vital water infrastructure projects.”

One major caveat about the new WRDA is that authorized funding still is subject to annual appropriations, spanning multiple years. Annual Corps civil works appropriations have been strong but are still far short of $34 billion. As with past bills, the roster of project authorizations is the centerpiece and legislative engine for the new Senate measure.

But the bill also has some important policy provisions, noted Tom Smith, American Society of Civil Engineers executive director. 

They include an increase in the federal cost share for projects that draw on the Inland Waterways Trust Fund to 75%, from 65%; defining U.S. policy to specifically include protecting shorelines and riverbanks from harm caused by climate change; and authorizing dredging for harbors in underserved communities.

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (W.Va.), the top Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee and a key player in drafting the bill, said the bill also contains provisions aimed at making Corps project delivery more effective, including language requiring reporting on timelines for environmental reviews.

Looking ahead, House committee Chair Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) said  in a statement that Senate bill "shares many similarities with the House-passed WRDA...with its focus on climate, resilience and affordability for Corps projects" as well as project authorizations. 

The House version does have fewer project authorizations than the Senate's, because it was approved earlier.

DeFazio, the main author of the House version, also said he looks forward to working with Carper and Capito "to pass the fifth biennial and bipartisan WRDA bill in a row."