ProjectsBusinessTransportationFinanceGovernment

Rural States Seek Federal Funding in Infrastructure Plan

William Panos

Looking ahead to President Trump’s $1-trillion, 10-year infrastructure plan, rural states are laying down a marker. Transportation officials from rural areas say public-private partnerships generally won’t help them. They say they need direct federal funding.

At a Feb. 8 Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing, William Panos, Wyoming Dept. of Transportation director, said, “Public-private partnerships and other approaches that depend on a positive revenue stream are not a surface-transportation infrastructure solution for rural states.” Panos, testifying for DOTs in Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming, said, “Any surface-transportation initiative should strongly emphasize formula funding.” He supports the 2015 Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act’s funding formula.

Steve Hall, an American Council of Engineering Companies vice president, says, “I think the message that has emerged … is that, if we’re going to do something big on infrastructure this year, it has to include something for the traditional federal programs to meet the needs of those states where there’s not a logical [public-private partnership] project.”

Trump campaign advisers have suggested drawing private infrastructure investors via tax credits. DOT Secretary Elaine Chao has said she believes direct federal funding would be in the plan, too.

Brian Pallasch, an American Society of Civil Engineers managing director, says rural areas could use P3 packages of small projects; Pennsylvania is rebuilding 558 bridges through such a P3. He says a new big infrastructure plan should have private dollars, plus state and local funds. “But there are going to be projects that still just need federal assistance, short of private-sector involvement … tax credits and all the other things that we’re talking about,” he says.

Rural voices have had an impact. The FAST Act sets aside for rural areas at least 25% of $4.5 billion in non-formula grants for key freight and highway projects. Congress also said at least 20% of the roughly $500 million in DOT 2016 TIGER grants had to go to rural projects.

Looking for quick answers on construction and engineering topics?
Try Ask ENR, our new smart AI search tool. Ask ENR →

As ENR's former Washington Bureau Chief, Tom Ichniowski wrote about the federal government since the George H.W. Bush administration, and covered at least five major highway bills. A recognized expert on government policy on infrastructure and regulation, Tom is also a Baltimore native and Orioles fan who grew up rooting for Brooks and Frank Robinson. He is a graduate of Columbia College and Columbia’s graduate school of journalism, where he once used “unrelentless” in a headline.

Post a comment to this article

Live: June 4, 2026 at 2:00 pm EDT Your VDC team invests weeks in coordination: modeling, resolving clashes, aligning MEP, structural, and specialty systems down to the inch. But when it's time to build, not nearly enough of that work actually reaches the field. We'll walk through how Skanska made it work, the key decisions, and the hard lessons.