Today’s construction industry is in an interesting time with a landscape that seems hardly untouched by tech in any area, unlike never before. The industry isn’t just changing and evolving in some, but rather ALL of the areas simultaneously. For an industry known as a bastion of steady habits and resistant to change, the tech revolution has finally come to one of the last places to embrace it. The conditions are ripe for technology to modernize the landscape of construction, and it doesn’t take a keen observer to realize just how much technology has already permeated the landscape. For example, consider the list of acronyms and buzzwords today: BIM, GIS, RTK, GNSS, DPD, AR/VR, and on and on they go. With so many, it’s hard to make sense of what’s applicable to your situation and what isn’t.
So, with so much technology out there, how do you know what to choose? For the most part, all technologies have their merits and weaknesses. After all, no developer of technology for this industry can serve all stakeholders. Rather, much of the technology is more niche by focusing on smaller areas for improvement that are more manageable while leaving room for others to contribute. The technology today is as diverse as the construction industry, and therefore options abound for stakeholders to choose from when attempting to revolutionize their part of the landscape.
In this article, we’ll share perspective on three key decision points when evaluating technology particular to Advanced Digital Construction Management Systems (ADCMS), and we’ll also discuss how each end-users experience and needs drive the framework for decision-making, particularly when it comes to integrations between technologies and the ability to leverage cross training of skills and abilities on those technologies as a way of providing greater use of increasingly limited staffing resources.
- Application, value, and price. Know your needs first.
Consider for a moment, the variety of costs associated with ADCMS systems. The range is as broad as the systems and characteristics they are made up of themselves. Many specialize only in vertical construction; many only in horizontal unit-based construction. Some do both, and yet others have been shown to be purpose-built for one, but flexible enough to be used for others. So understanding your needs, requirements, and constraints must come first.
Take for example, Infotech’s Appia®platform for construction administration and inspection. While purpose built for unit-based, horizontal construction, its agility is found in the highly configurable nature which allows it to be adapted to multiple different types of projects. With its unique ability to assign, report on, and prioritize fund sources and fund packages by individual items, it can be leveraged across multiple project types. Further still, Appia can analyze data from multiple bids for a single project via upload from a simple comma separated file. In this case, it is tasked only as a tool for engineers to use in streamlining the process of analysis. While not its intended purpose, it still brings a simple tool that streamlines and saves time.
It's in these types of “out of the box” applications that provide the greatest value when viewed through a lens of totality. Therefore, price ought to be the last of the three considerations as price alone has rarely been a good indicator of value or fit.
- The value of risk reduction.
One often overlooked and significantly undervalued advantage that using an ADCMS brings to the table is its inherent risk reduction. Stop for a moment and consider what the average construction claim is valued at. Then ask yourself, “How did it start?” And finally, consider the cost of the insurance policies and bonding that cover projects. In comparison to the gross dollars spent in aggregate around legal instruments which are meant to shift and control risk, ADCMS systems seem to do a far better job for the price.
For example, in a recent discussion with a client who uses Appia® for their inspection documentation process, a project owner called to inquire about what appeared to be an overbill on an invoice. The ability to quickly search the software-as-a-service to determine a late work day due to mechanical breakdown during paving resulted in a resolution in 20 minutes. If they were using a conventional paper process, an answer may have taken days, increasing the Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) for the particular AEC firm.
Or how about a project which involved the contractor working hand-in-hand via the ADCMS with the project inspectors and owners when an unforeseen condition was uncovered. The contractor, having adopted GPS machine-controls of their own, was able to share excavation information taken during the removal and remediation and share it with the team. The inspection team was then able to accurately determine the volume of the remediation from as-planned to as-built design and paid the contractor for the extra work without issue or delay.
