This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • News
    • Newswire
  • Southeast
  • Features
    • Projects
    • Companies
  • Top Lists
  • Current Issue
  • Blogs
  • Submit Your Photos
    • People
    • Events
    • Projects
  • ENR Home
  • Resources
    • Proposals & bids
    • Industry Jobs
    • Subscribe
    • eNewsletter
    • Events
    • Advertise
    • Reprints and Plaques
    • Staff Directory
    • Construction Cities
  • Other Regions
    • ENR Home
    • California
    • MidAtlantic
    • Midwest
    • Mountain States
    • New York
    • New England
    • Northwest
    • Southwest
    • Texas & Louisiana
Home » Construction, Operational Challenges Endanger $7.7B MOX Project
Southeast Construction NewsSoutheast

Construction, Operational Challenges Endanger $7.7B MOX Project

April 2, 2014
Scott Judy
Reprints
No Comments

The Dept. of Energy's $7.7-billion Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility at the Savannah River Site in Aiken, S.C., isn't dead yet. But the Obama administration's March budget request to put the unfinished plutonium disposal facility into "cold standby" could sound the bedeviled project's death knell.

Photo courtesy of the South Carolina Chapter of the Sierra Club
With construction costs soaring, and long-term operational costs doing the same, the Obama administration recommended halting the project and studying other alternatives for plutonium disposition.

The lack of an official baseline cost and schedule estimate, lax oversight by the project owner and suspected unforeseen design challenges sent construction costs soaring, according to a recent report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Long-term operational costs have more than doubled over early estimates—to more than $500 million per year—and DOE has failed to line up a utility willing to use MOX fuel.

Despite Washington's move to halt the project—which swiftly was met with a lawsuit by the state of South Carolina against DOE—construction and design work continues.

The DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) originally commissioned the project in response to a 2000 agreement between the U.S. and Russia to dispose of 34 metric tons of surplus weapons-grade plutonium by converting it into mixed-oxide fuel, or MOX, for use in commercial nuclear reactors. Shaw Areva MOX Services—a joint venture led by the Shaw Group, now owned by CB&I—began construction in August 2007, with completion of the then-$4.8-billion project set for 2016. As recently as 2011, the contractor's project executive, Kelly Trice, told ENR the builder was looking to move up that completion date by 16 months. Shaw Areva has a contract to design, construct, test, operate and then demolish the facility.

But that acceleration didn't happen. Instead, the contractor's latest proposal, submitted to NNSA in 2012, added nearly $3 billion to the project's cost estimate and extended the completion date to 2019. A February 2014 GAO report suggested the cost escalation was a by-product of the NNSA's lack of an official baseline cost and schedule estimate for the project, which currently is publicly reported as being 60% complete.

GAO stated, "The contractor's September 2012 estimate did not fully reflect the characteristics of a high-quality estimate and cannot be considered reliable" and, moreover, did not qualify as an approved cost and schedule estimate.

"Managing projects that no longer have an approved cost and schedule estimate is a challenge because cost and schedule estimates provide a baseline for measuring progress,” the report continued. The GAO further noted that top DOE officials recently acknowledged “that not having such a baseline is the point of maximum risk of unrestricted cost growth on a project.”

Additionally, NNSA now estimates the contractor's original design was only roughly 58% complete—an estimate based upon the design costs incurred during construction, the report says.

Those costs have been considerable. According to GAO, NNSA's fiscal 2014 budget request "stated that the cost of critical-system components for the MOX facility averaged 60% higher than estimated."

The GAO report also noted that the contractor was experiencing difficulty "identifying suppliers and subcontractors able to fabricate and install equipment meeting nuclear quality assurance criteria." Another challenge has been greater-than-expected turnover of engineering and technical staff. As a result, says the report: "The project lost staff to other nuclear industry projects, including projects in neighboring states, [has resulted] in a nearly complete turnover of construction management personnel over a period of several years and the need to provide training to replacement personnel.

Whether cost increases are a result of inadequate estimating or significant owner-initiated design changes is unclear, since DOE has not issued any public report on MOX's construction—and since neither NNSA nor Shaw MOX Areva Services would respond to questions from ENR.

But Tom Clements, an adviser to the South Carolina chapter of the Sierra Club who has followed the project for nearly 15 years, believes one thing is clear. "They're having trouble getting the French design [to meet] U.S. standards," he says. "I think they've just had a huge headache designing the plant properly."

Previous 1 2 Next

ENR Subscribe

Recent Articles by Scott Judy

Final Collapse Report Details Miami Bridge Team's Failures

FIGG's Theory of Collapse Failed to Sway NTSB Team

ENR Southeast's 2020 Class of Top Young Professionals Announced

Scoot-judy

Scott Judy is Deputy Editor for Regions, and editor of ENR Southeast, one of Engineering News-Record's 10 Regional publications. His roughly 27 years as a construction journalist began with an 11-year stint covering Midwest construction projects. In 2000, Judy helped launch the publication now known as ENR Southeast. He often delves into controversial aspects of the construction industry such as bankruptcies and fatal accidents, and wishes he would never have to cover another accident but suspects that he might.

Related Articles

MOX Project's Rising Costs a Challenge for DOE Plutonium Program

Contractor Seeks 10-Year Construction Extension for MOX Project

Related Products

Construction Project Management, 6th Edition

ENR March 11, 2019 Issue

Related Events

Creating a Scalable Drone Operation in Construction

Heavy Construction Execs Talk Tips for Integrating Field Operations and Accounting

Post a comment to this article

Report Abusive Comment


Top Lists

Top Design FirmsTop Design Firms
Southeast Design Firms Saw More Momentum in 2018



Top ContractorsTop Contractors
Contractors Keep Active as Southeast Region Stays Hot



Top Specialty ContractorsTop Specialty Contractors
Southeast Specialty Firms See Slight Slowdown Ahead




Industry Jobs

Videos

ENR Proposals and Bids


ENR Twitter
Tweets by @ENR_SE

ENR

ENR December 16, 2019 cover

Dec 16, 2019

To attract a broader and more diverse workforce, companies and unions are courting the LGBTQ+ community and strengthening recruiting and retention efforts.

View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • advertise
    • contact us
    • about us
    • photo submissions
    • customer service
    • digital edition
    • Survey And Sample
  • Subscription Center
    • Subscribe
    • Website Registration
    • Privacy Policy
    • eNewsletters
    • FAQ
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Slideshows
    • Photo Contest

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing