This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
ENR logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ENR logo
  • News
  • Projects
    • Buildings
    • Construction Methods
    • Design
    • Sustainability
    • Transportation
    • Environment
    • Power & Industrial
    • Water & Dams
    • Best Projects
  • Business
    • Safety & Health
    • Workforce
    • Finance
    • Companies
    • Project Delivery
    • Ethics & Corruption
    • Government
    • Risk
    • Pulse
    • Contractor Business Strategy
  • Talent
    • Awards
      • Top 25 Newsmakers
      • Award of Excellence
      • Legacy Award
      • Top Young Professionals
    • Promotions & New Hires
    • Obituaries
    • Annual Photo Contest
  • Regions
    • ENR California
    • ENR MidAtlantic
    • ENR Midwest
    • ENR Mountain States
    • ENR New York
    • ENR New England
    • ENR Northwest
    • ENR Southeast
    • ENR Southwest
    • ENR Texas & Louisiana
    • Regional Contests and Surveys
  • Tech
    • Information Technology
    • Construction Technology
    • BIM
  • Products
    • Equipment
    • Materials
    • Product Snapshot
  • Ideas
    • Blogs
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoints
    • Letters
    • Book Reviews
  • Costs
    • Construction Economics Archive
    • Construction Cost Index
    • Building Cost Index
    • Historical Indices
    • Quarterly Cost Reports
    • FAQs
  • Lists
    • ENR Top Lists
    • ENR Sourcebooks
    • Survey Schedule
  • CE Center
  • InfoCenters
    • Disrupt or Be Disrupted
    • Innovations in Waterproofing
    • Planning for Project Perfection
    • Revolutionizing Productivity Safety
    • The Business of Projects
  • Events
    • AEC BuildTech
    • Award of Excellence
    • Best of the Best Project Awards
    • FutureTech
    • Groundbreaking Women in Construction
    • Global Best Projects Awards
    • Port Authority of NY & NJ
    • Regional Best Projects
    • Top 25 Newsmakers
    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
  • More
    • Subscription
    • Proposals & Bids
    • Industry Jobs
    • Special Reports
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Store
    • Videos
    • Interactive Spotlights
    • Digital Editions
    • Year In Construction Photo Contest
    • Special Advertising Sections
  • About
    • Contact
    • Advertise
Home » EPA Carbon Proposal Could Shutter More Coal Plants
Get access for FREE with your paid ENR magazine subscription!
Government

EPA Carbon Proposal Could Shutter More Coal Plants

April 2, 2012
Pam Hunter McFarland
Reprints
No Comments

New rules proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency could put a choke hold on the construction of new, conventional coal-fired powerplants, industry sources say.

On March 27, the EPA proposed the first-ever Clean Air Act standard for carbon emissions from new powerplants. The proposed rule—which does not apply to existing powerplants or plants that already have been permitted and will break ground within the next 12 months—would require power-generating units to limit emissions of carbon dioxide to 1,000 pounds per megawatt. Currently, there are no limitations on how much carbon dioxide can be emitted by powerplants.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson told reporters that the proposed limits "are in line with investments already being made throughout the utility industry. … We have been working with stakeholders every step of the way.”

But according to Eileen Claussen, the president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, while the majority of existing natural-gas-fired powerplants already would meet the proposed standard, most new coal-fired powerplants not already in the pipeline would need to capture and permanently sequester their greenhouse-gas emissions in order to meet the limit. "This underscores the urgency of stronger public and private investment in carbon capture and storage technologies,” she said in a statement.

Jackson said utilities that want to build new coal plants will have two alternative paths to meet the standard: employing carbon capture and storage (CCS) or ensuring their average limit meets the 1,000-MW requirement over 30 years.

"We continue to believe that [CCS] is viable [and] … we believe that coal will remain an important part of the nation's energy mix," Jackson said.

While environmental groups praised the announcement, some industry sources blasted EPA’s latest action. Steve Miller, president and CEO of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, said, "This is another in a series of new regulations written by EPA to prevent the U.S. from taking advantage of our vast coal resources, [which] are responsible for providing affordable electricity for America’s families and businesses. This latest rule will make it impossible to build any new coal-fueled powerplants and could cause the premature closure of many more coal-fueled powerplants operating today.”

The proposed rule will be open for public comment for 60 days following its publication in the Federal Register.

Want to read more? Paid ENR magazine subscribers get full access. Login now or Register Your Email.
Not a Subscriber? Purchase TODAY...as low as $39.00 (digital) or $49.00 (print).
Privacy Policy

Related Articles

EPA Proposal Will Affect Coal Plants

EPA Proposes to Cut Carbon Emissions at New Powerplants

Subscription Center
  • Subscribe
  • Renew Your Subscription
  • eNewsletter Subscriptions
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Connect with ENR

More Videos

Popular Stories

NTSB final Report

Final Collapse Report Details Miami Bridge Team's Failures

The Claw

Famous Concert Stage Structure Becomes New Landmark for Utah Aquarium Expansion

1125MortMortensonobit.jpg

Mortenson Construction's M.A. "Mort" Mortenson is Dead at 82

Damaged tower cranes

Tricky Takedown of Tower Cranes Readied Collapsed New Orleans Hotel for Demolition

Southern Ohio Veterans Memorial Highway

Fixing Construction's Fixed-Price Conundrum

Industry Jobs



Products

2020 BNi Green Building Square Foot Costbook

2020 BNi Green Building Square Foot Costbook

See More Products

Special Ad Section

Spotlight on Service Providers
 Spotlight on Service Providers
 View all Special Ad Sections
 Archives

 


ENR

ENR Digital Edition Cover

Dec 9, 2019

A joint venture of Skanska, Corman Kokosing Construction Co. and McLean Contracting Co. is moving toward an early 2020 construction start for a $463-million replacement for a 79-year-old bridge across the Potomac River, south of Washington, D.C.

View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • advertise
    • contact us
    • about us
    • photo submissions
    • customer service
    • digital edition
    • Survey And Sample
  • Subscription Center
    • Subscribe
    • Website Registration
    • Privacy Policy
    • eNewsletters
    • FAQ
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Slideshows
    • Photo Contest

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing