This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Home » Don't Hold Surety Brokers Responsible For Contractor SBA Fraud
The U.S. regularly spends $500 billion each year on federal contracts, much of it going to small businesses, and it’s easy to see with such large sums of money why fraud is common. Unfortunately, the government is taking a major step in transferring some responsibility for discovering fraud to sureties, and that could end up hurting the small businesses that the government is trying to help.
In 2014, federal prosecutors brought a lawsuit against two federal contractors initiated by whistleblower Andrew Scollick, who worked as a jobsite supervisor. They accused the company owners of fraud related to their eligibility for work under SBA programs. The complaint alleges that the company owners fraudulently obtained HUB Zone, 8(a) and disabled veteran status. The allegation is common in False Claim Act lawsuits.