This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Home » TEA-21 DBE Plan Upheld, But State Use of Goals Barred
The provision in the 1998 federal Transportation Equity Act establishing the use of disadvantaged business enterprise goals was constitutional, but Washington states application of the goals program violated the constitution, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled.
After having two low bids in two months for federally funded paving jobs in Washington state rejected in favor of minority-owned firms, Western States Paving Co. sued the Washington State Dept. of Transportation, claiming that TEA-21s minority preference program violated its rights to equal protection under the constitution. A federal district court in Washington ruled that the preference program was constitutional both on its face and as applied by WSDOT, and it dismissed the claim.