![]() |
Chicago Climate Exchange Chairman Richard Sandor wants to reduce emissions and minimize transaction costs. |
Several large corporations recently announced they would voluntarily reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by participating in EPAs "Climate Leaders" program an industry-government partnership. Of the 54 participating companies, 20 have set formal goals that together will prevent the emission of 7.5 million metric tons of carbon equivalent per year, an amount equal to the emissions of five million cars, according to EPA.
The Climate Leaders program is a response to the White Houses stated goal of reducing U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity the ratio of emissions to economic output by American industry by 18% by 2012 through voluntary means.
|
"This program is the best way to move forward within our current statutory authority," says John Millett, spokesperson for EPA, adding that if industry is able to demonstrate the effectiveness of a voluntary program, a future mandatory system may be avoidable.
Many companies, however, say they are participating in EPAs program not to forestall future regulations but instead to better understand how a nationwide mandate might work, believing that formal GHG controls are inevitable, even if they are not implemented under the Bush administration.
"As a company, we believe that there will be a mandatory constraint on carbon sometime in the future. Our activities now are to allow us to gain an early-mover advantage," says Melissa McHenry, spokesperson for American Electric Power (AEP), Columbus, Ohio.
EPA requires participating companies to undertake a corporate-wide inventory of six GHGs, the most significant of which is carbon dioxide. The company then selects a reduction target either as a percentage of absolute GHG emissions or per unit of production. Climate Leaders must commit to provide EPA with periodic reports describing their progress toward meeting the agreed-upon emissions reduction goal. Third-party verification based on internationally accepted emissions accounting protocols must anchor supporting data.
Setting a Target | |||
Company | Location | Emissions Reduction Target | Date |
3M | St. Paul, Minn. | 30 % absolute reduction | 2007 |
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Sunnyvale, Calif. | 40 % of manufacturing index | 2007 |
American Electric Power | Columbus | 4 % absolute reduction | 2006 |
Cinergy Corp. | Cincinnati, Ohio | 5 % absolute reduction | 2010 |
Eastman Kodak | Rochester, N.Y. | 10 % absolute reduction | 2008 |
FPL Group Inc. | Juno Beach, Fla. | 18 % per kilowatt-hour | 2008 |
General Motors | Detroit, Mich. | 10 % absolute reduction | 2005 |
Holcim | Dundee, Mich. | 12 % per ton of cement | 2005 |
IBM Corp. | Armonk, NY | 4 % absolute annually; 10% in PFCs | 2005 |
Interface, Inc. | Atlanta, Ga. | 15 % per production unit | 2010 |
International Paper | Stamford, Conn. | 15 % absolute reduction | 2010 |
Johnson & Johnson | New Brunswick, NJ | 14 % absolute reductions | 2010 |
Miller Brewing | Milwaukee, Wisc. | 18 % per barrel of production | 2006 |
National Renewable Energy Laboratory | Golden, Colo. | 10 % per square foot | 2005 |
Norm Thompson | Portland, Ore. | 90 % absolute reductions | 2005 |
Pfizer | New York, N.Y. | 35 % per dollar revenue | 2007 |
PSEG | Newark, N.J. | 18 % per kilowatt-hour | 2008 |
S&C Johnson and Son, Inc | Racine, Wisc. | 23% per pound of product | 2005 |
St. Lawrence Cement | Quebec | 15% per ton of cement product | 2010 |
United Technologies Corp | Hartford | 16% per $ of | 2006 |
In the eyes of the environmental community, this rigorous transparency elevates the program above the public relations spin of industry-sponsored initiatives that lack accountability. While preferring a mandatory program, the EPA program is at least "based on a solid measurement system," says Janet Ranganathan, senior associate at the World Resources Institute, Wash, D.C.
EPA helps Climate Leader companies meet the accountability challenge by providing access to outside technical consulting expertise at no charge.
"EPA pays us to provide technical support to these companies," says Lisa Grice, director of GHG management programs, CH2M Hill, Englewood, Colo. This expertise is important because "for large companies, the baseline emissions inventory can require many steps" and can get very complex.
(Photo top courtesy of Chicago Climate Exchange)
Post a comment to this article
Report Abusive Comment